What is the difference between a farrowing crate and a gestation crate?
Gestation crates and farrowing crates are both extremely cruel forms of confinement that prevent pigs from standing or turning around. The main difference is that factory farms confine pigs in gestation crates during pregnancy, and keep pigs in farrowing crates after they give birth to a litter of piglets.
In the last few days of the pregnancy, sows move to farrowing crates, where they give birth to their piglets. These crates closely resemble gestation crates in that they enclose the mother’s body without enough room for the pig to turn around. But one side of the gate is grated, allowing the piglets to access the mother pig to nurse. The farrowing crate ultimately protects against a mother pig accidentally crushing her piglets, but it does so by completely preventing a mother pig from accessing her newborn piglets. She can’t build a nest for her piglets, groom them, bond with them, or communicate with them as she would in the wild.
Both gestation and farrowing crates are standard in the multi-billion dollar pork industry, which views mother and baby pigs as mere products—a way to make the most profits at the pigs’ expense.
How many pigs are in a gestation crate?
Each gestation crate confines one pig, allowing farmers to pack thousands of pigs in a single facility. She suffers alone in the tiny crate—a crate that is her entire world for so much of her short life.
As if spending most of each pregnancy alone in a gestation crate wasn’t traumatic enough, she endures more isolation in the vulnerable time following birth. After birth, she moves to a farrowing crate, where she cannot interact or show affection to her newborn babies.
Why do farmers use gestation crates?
The meat industry uses gestation crates to maximize profits at the expense of animals’ physical and mental well-being. By keeping pregnant pigs confined in the small crates, industrial farmers can crowd thousands of breeding sows inside a single shed. They don’t need to worry about controlling the amount a sow eats or handling the unique social hierarchies that sows establish in the wild. Housing pigs like this requires the bare minimum of personnel needed to manage the animals.
While industrial farmers argue that sows have more piglets when confined to gestation crates, a new study shows that these crates are actually less productive. Researchers analyzed 17 different countries: some where gestation crates are the norm, some where the crates are restricted, and others where gestation crates are completely banned. They found that rates of sow mortality were highest in countries with gestation crates. And not only that—they found that pig production per sow was “significantly lower” in those countries, too.
Due to the sheer amount of individual sows in a shed, many pigs face severe forms of neglect and horrific conditions. They wallow in built-up feces and filth. They rarely receive care for any of the pain or injuries they suffer from life in the crate. Some are even left to die on the concrete floors of factory farms. Although tragic, the industry overlooks these premature losses. They only want to keep mother pigs alive long enough to produce between three and five litters of piglets.
Why are gestation crates bad?
The pork industry treats female pigs as breeding machines, who produce litter after litter of piglets to raise and kill for food. When the industry can no longer profit off of a female pig’s body, they will kill her, too. Because of this, most research on gestation crates focuses on how they impact “reproductive performance” in pigs. They ignore how much pigs suffer physically and emotionally in such extreme confinement.
Behavioral restriction
Gestation crates confine pigs so tightly that she can’t even turn around, let alone move enough to engage in natural behaviors. This intensive physical restriction wears away at her bones and exhausts her muscles until she is overcome by constant pain. According to the USDA, Gestation crates weaken pigs’ cardiac functions, immune systems, and bone strength. They suffer the loss of muscle mass and overgrown hooves from lack of movement. They lack access to any clean water, leading to dehydration. Their filthy, bacteria-laden surroundings make them susceptible to painful urinary tract infections.
Sadly, due to their unnatural confinement, behaviors that normally help pigs survive end up hurting them even more. Pork producers prevent pigs from putting too much weight on while they are pregnant by depriving them of adequate food. To relieve their starvation, pigs resort to reaching for food from a neighboring trough, injuring themselves in the process.
Confinement injuries
In the small confines of a gestation crate, a pig risks painful injuries. A sow will often develop sores and abrasions from rubbing against the bars that confine her, or foot problems from constantly standing on hard, grated flooring. The constant pressure on the pigs’ skin results in painful lesions.
Stereotypy
Stereotypy describes when an animal engages in repetitive behaviors to cope with stress, including swaying, nodding, or biting on cage bars for an extended period. Animals showcase stereotypic behaviors in environments where they are captive, bored, and stressed out, like factory farms and zoos.
Pigs, bored and frustrated in their crates, use stereotypic behaviors to cope. But, their coping mechanisms do more harm than good: they bite over and over at the hard metal bars of their crates, and the friction creates painful sores inside their mouths.
Are gestation crates still used?
Sadly, the pork industry still uses gestation crates as standard practice.
There is no federal ban on gestation crates in the US. This cruel form of confinement is the norm in factory farms. According to a 2018 survey by the National Pork Producers Council, 80% of pork producers use gestation crates as standard practice.
Where are gestation crates banned?
Some countries have already banned gestation crates for their cruelty. Sweden was the first nation to ban gestation crates outright in 1994. In 2013, the European Union restricted the use of gestation crates to the first four weeks of a sow’s pregnancy, and the UK banned their use entirely.
Though the US lacks a nationwide ban on gestation crates, several states have already taken action to protect pigs by enacting bans, including Maine, Florida, Rhode Island, and Massachusetts, among others.
The biggest sign of progress toward banning crates came in 2018 when California voted to pass the Farm Animal Confinement Initiative, also known as Proposition 12. The legislation establishes minimum space requirements for all farmed animals and bans the sale of pork from pigs kept in gestation crates altogether. Prop 12 is among the strongest animal protection laws in the United States, sending a message to meat companies that they can’t continue to profit off of the worst forms of abuse.
In October 2022, the pig industry challenged Prop 12 in front of the Supreme Court of the United States, arguing for the right to keep pigs in cages. Along with our partner organizations, The Humane League's legal counsel mounted a valiant defense. The Supreme Court’s decision is expected in the spring or summer of 2023.
As consumers become more aware of the horrific conditions pigs experience, more companies will have to answer for their use of gestation crates. Without a meaningful policy, pork producers make empty promises about banning gestation crates, which some have already failed to live up to. Legislation is important to ensure that corporations live up to their animal welfare claims and don’t mislead concerned consumers.
Are there alternatives to using gestation crates?
Like most standard factory farm practices, gestation crates’ ultimate purpose is maximizing profits. Keeping pigs in the tightest spaces possible allows meat producers to fit thousands of pigs into a single farm, raising their bottom line at the expense of animal welfare. To protect their profits, pork producers often claim that there are no viable alternatives to the cruelty of crate confinement. However, less cruel alternatives do exist.
Instead of confining sows to individual cages, some farms opt for group housing—one of the most common alternatives to gestation crates. In group housing, animals have the freedom to move around and socialize with other pigs, free from the confines of an individual crate.
Although preferable to the agony of crate confinement, pigs still suffer in group housing. Group housing doesn’t guarantee outdoor access, nor does it prevent overcrowding. The pens can have the same slatted floors as gestation crates, making for entirely barren environments. Pigs still spend their entire life in a filthy, windowless shed, without ever seeing the sun.
Small farms use pasture systems as a more natural, humane option for raising pigs. In these systems, farmers leave herds of pigs to their own devices, allowing them to roam around outside and take shelter in huts that they frequent at their choosing. Although pasture systems provide pigs with a much better life, sadly, pasture systems account for less than 3% of meat production in the US. 97% of pigs experience life on a factory farm.
The bottom line is that millions of pigs suffer to end up on our plates, enduring cruel practices that are standard across the industry. However, switching to alternatives like group housing protects pigs from the worst form of confinement, allowing them to move with more freedom and sparing them from the painful injuries of crate confinement. Banning gestation crates and switching to alternative systems is a crucial first step toward a future where no pig has to suffer through life in the confines of a factory farm.
What you can do
Pigs are unique individuals with their own thoughts, feelings, and personalities, not unlike the dogs and cats we share our homes with. However, our broken food system does not treat pigs like the gentle, sentient beings that they are. Instead, it treats pigs like products for consumption. Sadly, an estimated 129 million pigs were killed in 2019 in the US alone.
To satisfy consumers’ demand for meat and maximize profits, pork producers subject pigs to the worst forms of cruelty in factory farms. Gestation crates are the most heinous ways meat producers cut corners in factory farms, inflicting a lonely life of extreme confinement on pregnant and mother pigs.
Mother pigs and their babies deserve better. While legislators and animal activists make efforts to ban the use of gestation crates, the best thing that you can do to stand up to the meat industry’s abuse is to leave pork products off your plate.
Thankfully, leaving animals off your plate is easier than ever, especially now that there is an ever-growing variety of plant-based foods that mimic all kinds of meat. These compassionate, plant-based alternatives are not only kinder to animals—they are good for your health and for the planet, too!
